Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG?
Date
Msg-id 14898.1241816610@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Tree view 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> so I think that it is much easier for the database engine to efficiantly
>> search two 500G tables instead of one 1T table.

> And that leads me to the opposite conclusion on this point.

I don't think there would be any difference on that score, either.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG?
Next
From: Paolo Rizzi
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL with PostGIS on embedded hardware