Re: Required make version - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Required make version
Date
Msg-id 14868.1204093681@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Required make version  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> ... This was in response to your request

> So obviously, there are a few possible solutions.  We just have to
> pick one we like best.

Check.

> We could actually query make whether it supports order-only prerequisites and
> only use the developer-optimized rules in that case.  That would mean, 
> however, that the optimized rules would only be used with GNU make 3.81 or 
> higher.  I read earlier that you use 3.79.1, so then you still wouldn't get 
> the behavior you want.

Well, it's not that I'm unwilling to install something newer, but I
deliberately run a trailing-edge toolchain on this particular machine
as a sanity check on what we require to build.  I don't think we should
increase our build tool requirements without a fairly good reason, and
my essentially-cosmetic request doesn't seem to me to be a good enough
reason.

Of the alternatives mentioned so far, suppressing the command echo
really seems the best to me ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: An idea for parallelizing COPY within one backend
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance