Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity
Date
Msg-id 14858.1083955441@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity  ("Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net>)
List pgsql-general
"Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net> writes:
> Sorry, I see that's *6B* per, so setting it to 3M ==> 18MB, which is trivial
> for the benefit.  Any other concerns in setting this too high?

Not that I know of.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Ed L."
Date:
Subject: Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity
Next
From: Jeff Boes
Date:
Subject: Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity