Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
> Does anyone object to this patch? I'm thinking to commit it separetely
> at first before committing the planning_counter_in_pg_stat_statements
> patch.
I took a quick look through v9-0001-Pass-query-string-to-the-planner.patch
and it's fine by me. It also matches up with something I've wanted to
do for awhile, which is to make the query string available during
planning and execution so that we can produce error cursors for
run-time errors, when relevant.
(It's a little weird that the patch doesn't make standard_planner
actually *do* anything with the string, like say save it into
the PlannerInfo struct. But that can come later I guess.)
Note that I wouldn't want to bet that all of these call sites always have
non-null query strings to pass; but probably most of the time they will.
regards, tom lane
