Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)
Date
Msg-id 1484483.1649951206@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:42 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I think you're trying to shoot the messenger.  As Andres says,
>> 277692220 just exposes that there is some pre-existing bug here.
>> It's probably related to 84f5c2908, so I was planning to take a
>> look at it at some point, but there are a few other higher-priority
>> bugs in the way.

> Well, if you're willing to look at it that's fine, but I just don't
> agree that it's OK to just commit things that add failing assertions
> and drive off into the sunset.

I don't think Andres had any intention of ignoring it indefinitely.
What he is doing is prioritizing it lower than several of the other
open items, an opinion I fully agree with.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse