Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca> writes:
> Are you ok with the DB2 and draft-spec syntax of NEXT VALUE FOR (where
> value is not a reserved word)? Or should I hold onto that until the
> spec has gone through the final draft / release?
By that time we'll have done the Oracle-style foo.nextval, and it'll
become kind of a moot point ;-)
regards, tom lane
