Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_walsummary, Character-not-present-in-option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_walsummary, Character-not-present-in-option
Date
Msg-id 1474982.1727712491@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_walsummary, Character-not-present-in-option  (btsugieyuusuke <btsugieyuusuke@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: pg_walsummary, Character-not-present-in-option
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
btsugieyuusuke <btsugieyuusuke@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
>> Therefore, shouldn't “f:” and “w:” be removed?

Looks like that to me too.  Pushed.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: AIO v2.0
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup and error messages dependent on the order of the arguments