Re: EXPLAIN omits schema? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?
Date
Msg-id 14728.1181757698@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Arguably this is a bug if it's causing pg_admin difficulties in parsing the
> output. Even for a user in an environment where, for example, he has several
> identical schemas and may be accidentally getting a different table than he's
> expecting the current output is ambiguous.

> Attached is a small patch which adds this conditionally on a guc that
> pg_admin or other GUI tools could set, leaving it unchanged for users.

That makes things *worse* not better, since now tools would have to
deal with both possibilities.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: \d omits schema on inherited tables (Was: EXPLAIN omits schema?)
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Controlling Load Distributed Checkpoints