Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Date
Msg-id 14685.1267131744@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables  (Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007@gmail.com> writes:
>           I think, somewhere things have been misunderstood. we only need 8
> bytes more per index entry. I thought Postgres has a 8 byte transaction id,
> but it is only 4 bytes, so we only need to save the insertion and deletion
> xids. So 8 bytes more per tuple.

What makes you think you can get away without cmin/cmax?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables