Re: [HACKERS] Improving RLS planning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Improving RLS planning
Date
Msg-id 14670.1484750217@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving RLS planning  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Improving RLS planning  (Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich@gmx.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> Thanks for the review.  Attached is an updated patch that I believe
>> addresses all of the review comments so far.  The code is unchanged from
>> v2, but I improved the README, some comments, and the regression tests.

> I've reviewed your updates and they answer all of my comments and I
> appreciate the EC regression tests you added.

> I also agree with Dean's down-thread suggested regression test change.

Thanks for reviewing --- I'll do something with that test case and
push it.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] emergency outage requiring database restart
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] References to arbitrary database objects that aresuitable for pg_dump