Re: Partitioned postgres tables don't need update trigger?? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From rverghese
Subject Re: Partitioned postgres tables don't need update trigger??
Date
Msg-id 1464990876552-5906415.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioned postgres tables don't need update trigger??  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Perfect! Thanks for the response! Just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing
anything.



--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Partitioned-postgres-tables-don-t-need-update-trigger-tp5906403p5906415.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioned postgres tables don't need update trigger??
Next
From: Greg Navis
Date:
Subject: Re: [pg_trgm] Making similarity(?, ?) < ? use an index