Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy
Date
Msg-id 1464594667.2179.48.camel@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

> - Build an embedded SQL C application with PostgreSQL 9.2.
> - Distribute the app without ecpg nor libpq libraries.  Require users
> to install PostgreSQL client which includes ecpg and libpq libraries.
> - Use the app with newer PostgreSQL major versions without rebuilding
> the app.  That is, the users just replaces the PostgreSQL client.
> 
> I expect this is legal, because the so_major versions of ecpg and
> libpq are 6 and 5 respectively for all PostgreSQL 9.x versions so
> far.  However, I could not find any description of this binary
> compatibility policy in the manual, so I haven't been able to answer
> the customer.

Sorry I fail to understand what you mean with "legal"? Are you
wondering about license restrictions? There are none.

As for compatibility, that's what major version numbers are for. This
is not a PostgreSQL topic, but a general system one as for instance the
same holds for libc.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Dunstan
Date:
Subject: IPv6 link-local addresses and init data type
Next
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy