Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
Date
Msg-id 1462871640306423663@unknownmsgid
Whole thread Raw
In response to A thought: should we run pgindent now?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Feb 17, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Which leads me to the thought that rather than postponing running
> pgindent until late beta, maybe we should run it *now*, and get the
> bulk of its work done for the new code in 9.0.  Then people would have
> a solid base to patch against, rather than having to expect a major
> merge hassle at the end of beta.

I was going to write an email proposing  something along these lines,
too - so +1 from me.

...Robert

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Introduce WAL records to log reuse of btree pages, allowing