Re: broken doc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: broken doc
Date
Msg-id 14619.1188533172@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: broken doc  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tatsuo Ishii wrote
>> Can someone please fix this?

> It's working for me

On Fedora Core 6's sgml toolchain, HEAD builds but un-commenting those
two index entries fails, just as Tatsuo says.

I'm no expert in this, but looking at the complained-of bookindex.sgml
entries makes me think that those index entries have a semantic conflict
with these entries over in indices.sgml:
  <indexterm>   <primary>GiST</primary>   <see>index</see>  </indexterm>
  <indexterm>   <primary>GIN</primary>   <see>index</see>  </indexterm>

Perhaps we need to have a meeting of the minds on who gets to define the
primary index entries about GiST and GIN?

Peter will probably have a clearer idea about how to fix this ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: broken doc
Next
From: Yoshiyuki Asaba
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb failed on Windows 2000