Re: isolation check takes a long time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: isolation check takes a long time
Date
Msg-id 14553.1343109739@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: isolation check takes a long time  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On fre, 2012-07-20 at 13:15 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> Meanwhile, I would like to remove the prepared_transactions test from 
>>> the main isolation schedule, and add a new Make target which runs that 
>>> test explicitly. Is there any objection to that?

> Why was this backpatched to 9.1?  That doesn't seem appropriate.

AIUI the point was to cut the load on buildfarm machines, so it won't
help (as much) if it's only applied to a subset of the branches that
have this test.  In any case, I don't follow your objection.  Removing
regression tests from stable branches is probably safer than removing
them from HEAD.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: ALTER command reworks
Next
From: Adam Crews
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres 9 bind address for replication