Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From kharagesuraj
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id 1454911101210-5886259.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
List pgsql-hackers
hello,

I have tested v7 patch.
but i think you forgot to remove some debug points in patch from
src/backend/replication/syncrep.c file.

for (i = 0; i < num_sync; i++)
+    {
+        elog(WARNING, "sync_standbys[%d] = %d", i, sync_standbys[i]);
+    }
+    elog(WARNING, "num_sync = %d, s_s_num = %d", num_sync,
synchronous_standby_num);

Please correct my understanding if i am wrong.

Regards
Suraj Kharage 





--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Support-for-N-synchronous-standby-servers-take-2-tp5849384p5886259.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL Re-Writes
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c