Hello, Tom.
You wrote:
TL> Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> On 12/13/2011 11:07 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> On MacOS X and Microsoft Windows, the world is far more messy. There
>>> are several ways to install libpq (one-click installer, fink,
>>> MacPorts, ...), and each of these ways allows the user to select an
>>> install location (or a prefix thereof) freely.
>> This is less controversial.
TL> Yeah, I'm aware that sane handling of library dependencies is
TL> practically impossible under Windows, but I didn't see how that would
TL> result in wanting to change the configure script. I wasn't thinking
TL> about OSX though. (You're aware that Apple ships a perfectly fine
TL> libpq.so in Lion, no?)
Is it true? Really? Where can we read about it?
TL> regards, tom lane
--
With best wishes,Pavel mailto:pavel@gf.microolap.com
