Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Not if the message is a constant string, which seems like the typical
>> situation (think "out of memory"). �If the row processor does need a
>> buffer for a constructed string, it could make use of some space in its
>> "void *param" area, for instance.
> If it's specified as string that libpq does not own, then I'm fine with it.
Check. Let's make it "const char **" in fact, just to be clear on that.
>> (This is why getAnotherTuple is careful to clear the failed result
>> before it tries to build a new one. �But that trick isn't going to be
>> available to an external row processor.)
> Kyotaro's original idea was to assume out-of-memory if error
> string was not set, thus the callback needed to set the string
> only when it really had something to say.
Hmm. We could still do that in conjunction with the idea of returning
the string from the row processor, but I'm not sure if it's useful or
just overly cute.
[ thinks... ] A small advantage of assuming NULL means that is that
we could postpone the libpq_gettext("out of memory") call until after
clearing the overflowed PGresult, which would greatly improve the odds
of getting a nicely translated result and not just ASCII. Might be
worth it just for that.
regards, tom lane
