Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Date
Msg-id 1452.1207058761@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work  (PFC <lists@peufeu.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
> Was the driver ever changed to take advantage of the above strategy?

Well, it's automatic as long as you use the unnamed statement.  About
all that might need to be done on the client side is to use unnamed
statements more often in preference to named ones, and I believe that
something like that did get done in JDBC.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Next
From: Michael Paesold
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work