Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Date
Msg-id 14518.1270651574@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection  (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> When there is a specific reject rule, why does the server say 
> FATAL:  no pg_hba.conf entry

It's intentional.  We try to expose the minimum amount of knowledge
about the contents of pg_hba.conf to potential attackers.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Olivier Baheux
Date:
Subject: system table/view and sequence
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection