Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums
Date
Msg-id 1451.1511727581@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Mumble.  It's a property I'm pretty hesitant to give up, especially
>> since the stats views have worked like that since day one.  It's
>> inevitable that weakening that guarantee would break peoples' queries,
>> probably subtly.

> You mean, queries against the stats views, or queries in general?  If
> the latter, by what mechanism would the breakage happen?

Queries against the stats views, of course.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory error in src/backend/replication/logical/origin.c