Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Beena Emerson
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id 1437376680972-5858502.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote: 

>synchronous_standby_name= is already 25 characters, so that leaves 115
characters - are they always single byte chars?

I am sorry, I did not get why there is a 140 byte limit. Can you please
explain?




-----
Beena Emerson

--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Support-for-N-synchronous-standby-servers-take-2-tp5849384p5858502.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)
Next
From: Marti Raudsepp
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_upgrade fails when postgres/template1 isn't in default tablespace