Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Date
Msg-id 14372.984678494@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC  (Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [010315 09:35] wrote:
>> BTW, are there any platforms where O_DSYNC exists but has a different
>> spelling?

> Yes, FreeBSD only has: O_FSYNC
> it doesn't have O_SYNC nor O_DSYNC.

Okay ... we can fall back to O_FSYNC if we don't see either of the
others.  No problem.  Any other weird cases out there?  I think Andreas
might've muttered something about AIX but I'm not sure now.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alfred Perlstein
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Next
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: rtrim giving weird result