Re: dblink performance regression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: dblink performance regression
Date
Msg-id 14354.1386526331@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dblink performance regression  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> I don't think it makes sense to create a new function in dblink either
> -- we're only talking about two lines of added redundancy which is
> less lines of code than a new function would add.

Indeed, and I think the claim that such a function "encapsulates" anything
useful is pretty silly as well.  I think the committed patch is fine.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WITHIN GROUP patch
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good