Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Date
Msg-id 1433.1246554830@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Yes.  What I was thinking of doing was committing a configure change to
> reject flex < 2.5.31, and waiting to see how much of the buildfarm goes
> red.

Actually, most of the buildfarm members show which flex version they are
running in the configure output.  A quick look shows that of the 45
members that have reported on HEAD in the past 2 days, 22 are running
2.5.4, which is a lot higher than I was expecting.  Most of these are
the Solaris boxen, which I imagine can be updated fairly painlessly
since there are some of them that are already running something newer.
However I'm a bit worried about the situation for Windows --- does
anyone know whether a newer flex is readily available for Windows?

In any case it seems like it'd be prudent to prod the buildfarm owners
to update their flex *before* we pull the trigger...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5