Re: HASHes [was Re: Calling PL functions with named parameters] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: HASHes [was Re: Calling PL functions with named parameters]
Date
Msg-id 14313.1092672433@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to HASHes [was Re: Calling PL functions with named parameters]  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> What about making HASHes a first-class object?

I see less than zero value in this.  You'd have to serialize the
contents to ship it to the client anyway, so there is no particular
point in inventing a random new representation for "row".
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: HASHes [was Re: Calling PL functions with named parameters]
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_subtrans and WAL