Re: getting rid of SnapshotNow - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: getting rid of SnapshotNow
Date
Msg-id 14297.1374844687@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: getting rid of SnapshotNow  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: getting rid of SnapshotNow
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> What about SnapshotSelf?

> Well, that's still used in _bt_check_unique, unique_key_recheck
> (trigger function to do a deferred uniqueness check), RI_FKey_check,
> and rather extensively by sepgsql.  I don't really have much desire to
> do the work to get rid of it, though.

Hm.  I agree the first three may be all right, but I can't help
suspecting that sepgsql is doing the wrong thing here.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: didier
Date:
Subject: Re: Design proposal: fsync absorb linear slider
Next
From: Ronan Dunklau
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions makefiles - coverage