Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning
Date
Msg-id 1425446.1675291093@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning
Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> You mentioned "minor releases" here. Who said anything about that?

I did: I'd like to back-patch the fix if possible.  I think changing
the default --load-via-partition-root choice could be back-patchable.

If Robert is resistant to that but would accept it in master,
I'd settle for that in preference to having no fix.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning