Re: BUG #8469: Xpath behaviour unintuitive / arguably wrong - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From David G Johnston
Subject Re: BUG #8469: Xpath behaviour unintuitive / arguably wrong
Date
Msg-id 1423030974840-5836676.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #8469: Xpath behaviour unintuitive / arguably wrong  (Вилен Тамбовцев <v.tambovtsev@outlook.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #8469: Xpath behaviour unintuitive / arguably wrong  (Вилен Тамбовцев <v.tambovtsev@outlook.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
=D0=92=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD =D0=A2=D0=B0=D0=BC=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=B2=D1=86=
=D0=B5=D0=B2-2 wrote
> Actually,  xpath()'s output is not original XML, at least there must be a
> function like XML_UNESCAPE() for current behavior
> otherwise there is no way to get proper xml with xpath

Based upon the link provided this has been acknowledged.

My personal opinion is that this is a bug (via omission) that the patch
introduced and that said patch author or committer should work to rectify.=
=20
Our XML/xpath handling is a large brick shy of a load if we do not provide =
a
way to make Unescaped text extraction possible.

David J.



--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Re-BUG-8469-Xpat=
h-behaviour-unintuitive-arguably-wrong-tp5836629p5836676.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Sandeep Thakkar
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL - Installation on Windows 8 - I need help
Next
From: Elijah Zupancic
Date:
Subject: pg_dump search path issue