Re: PGDG repo differences for RHEL 6.6 / 7. - Mailing list pgsql-pkg-yum

From Devrim Gündüz
Subject Re: PGDG repo differences for RHEL 6.6 / 7.
Date
Msg-id 1422961130.14827.10.camel@gunduz.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PGDG repo differences for RHEL 6.6 / 7.  ("Graeme B. Bell" <grb@skogoglandskap.no>)
Responses Re: PGDG repo differences for RHEL 6.6 / 7.  ("Graeme B. Bell" <grb@skogoglandskap.no>)
List pgsql-pkg-yum
Hi Graeme,

On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 13:47 +0000, Graeme B. Bell wrote:

> - Do you think there is any possibility that the PGDG RHEL6 builds
> could be updated to gdal 1.11 to match the RHEL7 branch?

No. That will break RHEL 6. (I am also an EPEL packager, and I know what
it feels to push such an update to RHEL ...)

> - It seems that there is no "BIGTIFF" support in the PGDG GDAL in
> RHEL6.
> This is strange because BIGTIFF has been supported since GDAL 1.4.4
> (2007).
> That means that raster sizes are limited to 4GB which is pretty small
> for anyone doing national level work.
>
> Is there any reason that the BIGTIFF option isn't supported or could
> it be enabled in future builds?
> Perhaps the person who is building is not using libtiff or has
> disabled it?

AFAICS, libtiff > 4.0 is required for BIGTIFF support, and RHEL 6 has
libtiff 3.9.4. Again, AFAICS, GDAL's configure can pick BIGTIFF support
automagically when it finds the related version of libtiff. I suppose
RHEL 7 has this support.

Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR


Attachment

pgsql-pkg-yum by date:

Previous
From: David Markham
Date:
Subject: Unable to create postgis 2.1.5 extension in PG9.2.8/rhel6
Next
From: "Graeme B. Bell"
Date:
Subject: Re: PGDG repo differences for RHEL 6.6 / 7.