Stephen Frost wrote
> * Alvaro Herrera (
> alvherre@
> ) wrote:
>> Stephen Frost wrote:
>> > * Amit Kapila (
> amit.kapila16@
> ) wrote:
>> > > What exactly you mean by 'disable postgresql.auto.conf', do you
>> > > mean user runs Alter System to remove that entry or manually disable
>> > > some particular entry?
>>
>> Sigh, here we go again. I don't think you can disable
>> postgresql.auto.conf
>> in the current code. As I recall, the argument was that it's harder to
>> diagnose problems if postgresql.auto.conf takes effect in some system
>> but not others.
>
> I don't buy this at all. What's going to be terribly confusing is to
> have config changes start happening for users who are managing their
> configs through a CM (which most should be..). ALTER SYSTEM is going to
> cause more problems than it solves.
So what happens if someone makes postgresql.auto.conf read-only (to
everyone)?
David J.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Turning-recovery-conf-into-GUCs-tp5774757p5828052.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
