Re: inconsistent owners in newly created databases? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: inconsistent owners in newly created databases?
Date
Msg-id 14151.1083601660@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: inconsistent owners in newly created databases?  (Thomas Swan <tswan@idigx.com>)
Responses Re: inconsistent owners in newly created databases?  (Thomas Swan <tswan@idigx.com>)
Re: inconsistent owners in newly created databases?  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Swan <tswan@idigx.com> writes:
> Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> You don't want to update ownership of tables in system schemas.
>> 
> AFAICS, any changes they make are localized to their database not the 
> whole database system.

A database owner who is not a superuser should *not* be able to fool with
the built-in catalog entries.

Database owner != superuser, and I don't want us blurring the distinction...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: cvs: mislinked plpgsql.so ?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird prepared stmt behavior