Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 19:07 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The status of this patch isn't clear --- are you still working on it?
>> There certainly appear to be a lot of debug leftovers that need to
>> be removed, error messages to clean up, etc.
> It passes all existing regression tests and works fine for "correct"
> use,
I'm returning this patch for rework. You still have done nothing about
the above complaints (useless noise added to elog messages, elog(NOTICE)
debug messages that should have been removed, etc). I started to clean
this up myself but got too annoyed when I found that the patch had
removed security-critical checks that reject pseudotype result types.
I have other things to do than clean up WIP patches.
regards, tom lane
