Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: log_duration is redundant, no? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
Date
Msg-id 14115.1158411782@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: log_duration is redundant, no?  ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> writes:
> My only concern was that we now have less information with
> log_statement='all' than with log_min_duration_statement.

Well, you don't have the durations, but log_statement isn't supposed to
tell you that.  So I'm still quite confused about what it is that you
want to do differently.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Include file in regress.c
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing data type space usage