Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G Johnston
Subject Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence?
Date
Msg-id 1409361785561-5816996.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence?  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund-3 wrote
> On 2014-08-29 17:55:38 -0700, David G Johnston wrote:
>> Andres Freund-3 wrote
> 
>> 
>> pg_get_sequence_ownedby(...)
> 
> My problem is that that possibly be confused with the user owning the
> sequence :/

Though as soon as that person reads the output their misunderstanding would
be obvious.

I think it's fine but "ownedbycol" or "owningcol" would be ok.

David J.



--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Inverse-of-pg-get-serial-sequence-tp5816933p5816996.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence?
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: On partitioning