On 2019/03/06 11:29, David Rowley wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 15:26, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>
>>> I've tried to put all this right again in the attached. However, I was
>>> a bit unsure of what "but they can be moved into a foreign table if
>>> the foreign data wrapper supports it." is referring to. Copying Robert
>>> and Etsuro as this was all added in 3d956d9562aa. Hopefully, they can
>>> confirm what is meant by this.
>>
>> Did you miss my reply on that thread?
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqF3gma5HfCJb4_cOk0_%2BLEpVc57EHdBfz_EKt%2BNu0hNYg%40mail.gmail.com
>
> Yes. I wasn't aware that there were two threads for this.
Ah, indeed. In the documentation fix patch I'd posted, I also made
changes to release-11.sgml to link to the limitations section. (I'm
attaching it here for your reference.)
Thanks,
Amit
