Re: Interface for pg_autovacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Interface for pg_autovacuum
Date
Msg-id 14063.1166679488@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Interface for pg_autovacuum  ("Jim Nasby" <jim.nasby@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Jim Nasby" <jim.nasby@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On the other hand, this would be the only part of the system where  
> the official interface/API is a system catalog table.

I don't think it was ever intended by anyone that that would be the
long-term solution.  Where we are currently at is experimenting to find
out what autovacuum's control knobs ought to be.  The catalog table was
a suitably low-effort way to expose a first cut at the knobs.  The fact
that pg_dump doesn't dump the settings is entirely deliberate: that's to
avoid locking us into a forward compatibility commitment before we're
ready.  Once we are happy with the control design, we can think about
what the long-term API ought to be.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: Load distributed checkpoint
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Release 8.2.0 done, 8.3 development starts