Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I will keep the patch for a day and apply it if no one objects.
I object. You still have no idea what that test is for or whether
there may be any value in keeping it. It seems clear that the original
GIST authors thought the flag was useful.
I should also point out that the fact that the flag is always "true"
today is because I ripped out some code in index.c a version or three
back. 6.5 had
indexForm->indhaskeytype = 0;
while (attributeList != NIL)
{
IndexKey = (IndexElem *) lfirst(attributeList);
if (IndexKey->typename != NULL)
{
indexForm->indhaskeytype = 1;
break;
}
attributeList = lnext(attributeList);
}
which I removed because it was a security hole (you could tell the
system to treat any data type as any other datatype, with obvious
possibilities for coredump). But I didn't look hard at what the
GIST code was using the flag for...
regards, tom lane
