David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> It's missing a few pieces like surfacing transition table names.
> I'll work on those. Also, it's not clear to me how to access the
> pre- and post- relations at the same time, this being necessary
> for many use cases. I guess I need to think more about how that
> would be done.
If you're going to do any work on the C extension, please start
from the attached. I renamed it to something which seemed more
meaningful (to me, at least), and cleaned up some cosmetic issues.
The substance is the same.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
