Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote:
> I've already said that I now think we should use the standard
> CREATE TRIGGER syntax to specify the transition tables, and that
> if we do that we don't need the reloption that's in the patch.
> If you ignore the 19 lines of new code to add that reloption,
> absolutely 100% of the code changes in the patch so far are in
> trigger.c and trigger.h.
Although nobody has actually framed their feedback as a review, I
feel that I have enough to work with to throw the patch into
Waiting on Author status. Since I started with the assumption that
I was going to be using standard syntax and got a ways into that
before convincing myself it was a bad idea, I should have a new
version of the patch working that way in a couple days.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
