On Nov 15, 2007 8:17 PM, Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk> wrote:
> As Albe suggested, a view is about all that's going to help the poor
> people who work with this. When I do this sort of thing, I tend to
> find that there are very few queries that actually need everything all
> together in one place.
True in our case also.
> It's generally that (using the naming above)
> that you'd do a query on "table1", "test" and something that references
> "test". Queries that reference "test", "table1" and "table2" are
> reasonably rare. Of course, it could be that I was just lucky here.
Now I know we are not alone handling these type of tables :-)
Best regards,
Ma Sivakumar
--
மா சிவகுமார்
எல்லோரும் எல்லாமும் பெற வேண்டும்
http://masivakumar.blogspot.com