Re: Professional Service Directory Review - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Professional Service Directory Review |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1399796425.2860.3.camel@localhost.localdomain Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Professional Service Directory Review (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Responses |
Re: Professional Service Directory Review
|
List | pgsql-www |
On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 09:16 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Jonathan S. Katz > <jonathan.katz@excoventures.com> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > On May 4, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Jonathan S. Katz > > <jonathan.katz@excoventures.com> wrote: > > > > A part of the http://www.postgresql.org site that was in desperate need of > > review was our professional service directory > > (http://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support/). Over the past > > few days, we have conducted a review and have posted the comprehensive > > results here: > > > > https://docs.google.com/a/excoventures.com/spreadsheets/d/1NVLEH01ShMrk_9byQOxwAJWj28-Ub5RqU1ZV9P4Fg6U/edit?pli=1#gid=0 > > > > A brief summary: > > > > * 318 services reviewed > > * 179 were re-approved > > * 77 were removed > > * 62 are still under review and temporarily delisted, see below > > > > Services that are "Under Review" have been de-listed and sent a note from > > our moderation panel specifying what they need to fix in order to be > > re-listed. Because most of the changes would be minor, they have been given > > a week since being contacted to update their information and contact > > webmaster@postgresql.org otherwise they will be removed. > > > > The services were reviewed impartially without looking into the quality of > > the service the company is providing, which of course would be impossible to > > judge without subscribing to the service. When reviewing, we wanted to make > > sure that: > > > > a) The company had a web presence > > b) The information in the profile was accurately reflected on their website > > and vice versa > > > > Of course, it is not a fun task to review 318 services! We are going to > > attempt to review the services more frequently (e.g. every 1-2 years as > > opposed to....?), but we kindly ask everyone to please make sure that their > > information stays up-to-date, which will certainly help the moderation > > process. > > > > If you believe your listing was removed incorrectly or have any questions > > about updates to your listing, please send an email to > > webmaster@postgresql.org > > > > > > The review is complete. 183 professional services were kept, 137 were > > removed. For the full list, please see > > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NVLEH01ShMrk_9byQOxwAJWj28-Ub5RqU1ZV9P4Fg6U/edit?usp=sharing > > > > Again, if you believe your listing or any other listing was removed > > incorrectly or have any questions, please send an email to > > webmaster@postgresql.org > > Nice! Thanks Jonathan. > Yeah, that must have been a huge work. Thanks a lot. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com