On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 11:10 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2014-05-02 10:56 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>:
>
> > On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 08:36 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > but I am looking for, so in early next versions some interesting
> > bgworkers
> > > > will be in core - scheduler, idle connection killer, multi CPU sorter,
> > ...
> > > -1 for that. Those bgworkers things satisfy very specific needs (I
> > > implemented one of them in the list). I'd rather see a wiki page
> > > listing them properly and let each implementer maintain their code.
> > >
> >
> > Completely agree with Michael. I see them just like FDWs. We don't add
> > some FDW in the core. Some are contrib modules, some are available
> > elsewhere. BgWorkers should be handled the same way.
> >
>
> When I spoke "core" - I though a "contrib" resp. upstream
>
Oh OK. Then I'm fine with adding some as contrib modules :)
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
