Tom Lane-2 wrote
> Or we could add them into
> just the first planning-time printout, though that might also be
> misleading.
If you are going to show a number for these steps, which seems like a good
idea, then this seems like a reasonable option in the face of this
situation.
Basically two options:
1. Query overhead timing detailed separately
2. Query overhead included with first plans' planning time
An explain option: (OVERHEAD '[off?|detail|first]') would then give the user
the ability to choose between the two (not sure if off is worthwhile but
worth at least rejecting explicitly).
David J.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/So-why-is-EXPLAIN-printing-only-plan-time-tp5801663p5801674.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
