Re: Minimum supported version of Python? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Minimum supported version of Python?
Date
Msg-id 1395893488.30049.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Minimum supported version of Python?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Minimum supported version of Python?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 18:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> After further experimentation, I've found that 2.3 does pass the
> regression
> tests if one installs the separately-available cdecimal module.  So my
> complaint reduces to the fact that our "Requirements" documentation
> doesn't mention the need for this.  Do you have an objection to adding
> something there?

You backpatched this change, but that can't be right, because the
feature that requires the cdecimal module was added in 9.4
(7919398bac8bacd75ec5d763ce8b15ffaaa3e071).




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Why MarkBufferDirtyHint doesn't increment shared_blks_dirtied
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Few new warnings have been introduced in windows build (jsonb_util.c)