Re: elog() proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: elog() proposal
Date
Msg-id 13941.1014352094@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: elog() proposal  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: elog() proposal  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Actually, it is even simpler.  Let's do this:
> Client levels:
>     DEBUG, LOG, INFO, NOTICE, ERROR
> Server levels:
>      DEBUG, INFO, LOG, NOTICE, ERROR, FATAL, CRASH

Hmm, so the two cases have different ideas of the ordering of the
levels?  Could be confusing, but it does keep the configuration
entries simple-looking.

What's your reaction to Peter's comments that the whole notion of
a linear set of elog levels should be abandoned?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Feature enhancement request : use of libgda
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: elog() proposal