Re: Is it reasonable to store double[] arrays of 30K elements - Mailing list pgsql-general

From lup
Subject Re: Is it reasonable to store double[] arrays of 30K elements
Date
Msg-id 1392415663145-5792099.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Is it reasonable to store double[] arrays of 30K elements  (AlexK <alkuzo@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Is it reasonable to store double[] arrays of 30K elements  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Would 10K elements of float[3] make any difference in terms of read/write
performance?
Or 240K byte array?

Or are these all functionally the same issue for the server? If so,
intriguing possibilities abound. :)





--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-reasonable-to-store-double-arrays-of-30K-elements-tp5790562p5792099.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: automatically refresh all materialized views?
Next
From: Behrang Saeedzadeh
Date:
Subject: Is PostgreSQL 9.3 using indexes for pipelined top-N window function queries?