Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: generic pseudotype IO functions? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?
Date
Msg-id 1389615161.18185.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 17:36 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> FWIW, I am perfectly fine with duplicating the functions for now - I
> just thought that that might not be the best way but I didn't (and
> still
> don't) have a strong opinion.

Could we just put 0 in for the functions' OID and have code elsewhere
that errors "there is no input function for this type"?

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] Archive recovery failure on 9.3+.
Next
From: Rajeev rastogi
Date:
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master