Re: [PATCH] Largeobject Access Controls (r2432) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] Largeobject Access Controls (r2432)
Date
Msg-id 13889.1259872431@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Largeobject Access Controls (r2432)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Largeobject Access Controls (r2432)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I agree that search and replace isn't that hard, but I don't find the
> proposed construction awkward, and we have various uses of it in the
> docs already.  Actually the COPY one is not quite clear whether it
> means <= 7.3 or < 7.3.  I think we're just aiming for consistency here
> as much as anything.

Well, the problem is that "<= 8.4" is confusing as to whether it
includes 8.4.n.  You and I know that it does because we know we
don't make feature changes in minor releases, but this is not
necessarily obvious to everyone.  "< 8.5" is much less ambiguous.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Largeobject Access Controls (r2432)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Largeobject Access Controls (r2432)