Re: pg_rewarm status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: pg_rewarm status
Date
Msg-id 1387292932.59827.YahooMailNeo@web162905.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_rewarm status  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have used pg_prewarm during some of work related to Buffer
>> Management and other performance related work. It is quite
>> useful utility.
>> +1 for reviving this patch for 9.4
>
> Any other votes?

Where I would have used a prewarm utility is following an off-hours
VACUUM FREEZE run.  Where this maintenance made sense the only
downside I saw was a brief period in the mornings where the cache
was not populated with the "hot" data, and performance was somewhat
degraded until the cache settled in again.

So, +1.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: make_timestamp function
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: commit fest 2013-11 final report